Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) continued its strong financial performance in the September quarter with profits and sales rising strongly on a sequential and year-over-year basis.
The high-tech market is struggling, though, and analysts are forecasting weaker sales ahead due to problems in the general economy, especially in Europe and North America. Intel admitted to some weakness in the consumer market but says it sees growth in developing economies as well as in the corporate market. The only dark cloud on the horizon is the continuing uncertainty about 2011. Here are some takeaways both from the company’s results and from the general market:
Many new markets are emerging. The list of markets Intel could extend its microprocessors into include recently introduced products like netbooks and tablet PCs, but there are other exciting areas that are not so well known. These include smart meters, digital signs, in-vehicle "infotainment," retail, and ATM solutions, areas that offer excellent opportunities for revenue expansion, according to Paul Otellini, president and CEO of Intel, during a conference call Tuesday, Oct. 12.
Will the tablet PC hurt Intel, and has the company missed the new opportunity opened up by Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)’s iPad? Some analysts believe so, but that’s not how Intel sees it. “The big question on everyone’s mind is how Intel will respond to new computing categories where Intel has little presence, specifically tablets,” Otellini said. “We think tablets are exciting, and we fully welcome their arrival. Apple has done a wonderful job reinventing the category. Will they impact PC sales? Sure. At the margin, they probably will, [but] we are deeply engaged with a number of partners to bring to market innovative tablet solutions.”
There’s still a lot of uncertainty in the market. Despite reporting strong sequential revenue growth and forecasting a strong increase for the fourth quarter, Intel executives still appear concerned about the first half of 2011. They ought to be, and if you have your money in Intel, so should you. Why? The strong fourth-quarter forecast really tells us little that we don’t already know. Most companies by now have a good idea of their likely performance in the ongoing quarter because manufacturers place component orders several weeks and months ahead.
Intel’s guidance for the fourth quarter therefore only tells us what is happening now and offers no window into the critical first quarter of the coming year. With the economy growing only slowly, the strong 2010 third and fourth quarter performance may not be repeated in the first half of 2011. Caution is therefore warranted.
No other large acquisitions are being planned by Intel. “We always look for opportunities to create shareholder value [but] there are no other large acquisitions currently being contemplated,” said Stacy Smith, Intel’s CFO, during the conference call. That’s understandable. The company just made two rather large purchases: It paid $1.4 billion for Infineon Technologies AG (NYSE/Frankfurt: IFX)'s wireless solutions business and $7.68 billion for McAfee Inc. (NYSE: MFE) -- and even though some analysts expect it to continue making a push into communications to broaden its portfolio, Intel may be more cautious this time around. The company is still being criticized for the more than $10 billion it spent in the earlier part of this decade on acquisitions that have not yielded the expected returns.
Consumer spending remains weak. Consumers buoyed the market over the last several quarters, but sales into this demographic have slowed down sharply, except in developing economies like China and India. In North America and Europe, harried consumers worried over high unemployment figures are skittish to buy high-tech equipment. “It was in the mature markets -- US, Japan, and Western Europe -- that we saw some of the softness on the consumer side,” Otellini said.
The enterprise market is helping to prop up high-tech goods sales for now, but this too might be temporary. In a growing economy, companies do not only replace old equipment, but they also buy new kit for freshly hired employees. Since hiring appears to have stalled, the likelihood of a continued bounce in high-tech equipment purchases for employees remains very low.
Inventory levels are rising, but they are not excessive. The electronics supply chain may have seen some increase in channel inventories during the third quarter, but even this increase has been modest. (See 2010 Chip Forecast Slashed on Higher Inventory.) Rising inventories are always a problem, but there are indications the industry will quickly apply the brakes and bring inventories back into normal range. What this means is that a turnaround in demand during the first half of 2011 (my prediction) will quickly drain any inventory excesses and push up production as manufacturers race to satisfy customer requirements.
Intel overall is in excellent shape with strong upside promises for the future. I could rephrase it but I believe Stacy Smith, Intel’s chief financial officer captured it best when he said the following in the conference call: “In gross margin, our cost structure is just fundamentally better than it has been. The factories have done an outstanding job in bringing their productivity up, their efficiency up, their cost structure up. And then from a company level, we are benefiting a bit from mix. We divested the NOR business and we made great improvements to the NAND business. Those were probably a couple of drags to gross margin historically that we have now eliminated.”
Remember the saying "Jack of all trades, master of none"
I feel like sometimes these companies (a la Google) tries to have a hand in EVERYTHING! WHy, I don't know. I guess they want to be known as the guys that revolutionize EVERYTHING. THe problem with that concept is that if you fail is alot of things, it might outshine the few things that you do exceptionally.
Google has the advantage in the cloud but if they keep trying to take over the world (as some say), they might end up tripping over Apple's path to the top.
I appreciate your comment. Well my take on that, Apple products will just come and go. Just like Nokia and Motorola during the start of the cellphone era. They were the key players during the start of the age of cellphones. I wont argue that Apple is one of the biggest innovators for this decade. The touchscreen technology is really great. However, not all consumers are really into touchscreen technology.
I just want to react to your statement -" Apple is transforming the way people do things, not just the devices they use to get things done" --- what about Google?
I guess Google is something we should consider as the biggest threat for Apple.
I appreciate your response on the former topic. BUT to touch on the latter, I don't know if you can consider the iProducts as fads. This might be the topic of another post but Apple has done a great job to spoonfeed its customers ideas. Now it's sort of like an addiction. It's sort of like 15 years ago when the iMacs started getting hot. No one thought i would last but voila, now we have iPod, iPad, iMac, etc.
Apple is transforming the way people do things, not just the devices they use to get things done. I see what you're trying to say but fad might not be the right word. They are more on a wave of innovation that builds on the crack model of tech (ie. hard to break that cycle once it's in motion).
Pocharle, you are right that AMD is one of the biggest competitor of Intel. However, AMD is the main choice of people/business who are into gaming application, services etc. Intel so far dominates the other sector. Going back to the main topic, the major players of the OEM industry are into outsourcing. As mentioned by Bolaji in his article though theres a slow down in sales in different demography, the sales in China and India is somehow not affected. I think Intel should be more aggressive in getting OEM and other business deals in countries where most electronic companies outsourced their services.
I don't see any threat with the Apple being in the market. Apple Ipad, Ipod etc are just fads.
Anna, Intel will have to learn to share. The era of a single company dominating in any segment of the electronics industry is likely over although consolidation will reduce the number of players eventually. Still, the industry is now thoroughly wary of fostering the creation of another Intel monopoly situation and as a result, we are likely to see the emergence of multiple suppliers that may be equally balanced in terms of market share. I have to admit, though, that some companies are starting out with a hefty advantage.
Companies like Intel have huge cash generating businesses already and can afford to spend what it takes to win. Others may only have one shot. If I have to put my money on a winner in any of the segments outlined by Intel's president Paul Otellini, I would go with Intel, even in an area like tablet PCs. Apple can try to dominate this segment but it is still a single player in a sector where many companies want a share. Intel will team up with these companies and sell its microprocessors to as many OEMs as possible while Apple will use its internally developed processor but not license this to rivals. That strategy will help Apple control the user experience but it's not a strategy for high volume generation.
I am fascinated by the way Intel is having to change its definition and understanding of its main market nowadays. This company has for some time focused on being a PC microprocessor supplier and over years directed a huge portion of its resources into building plants and developing the technology to support the computer market. Now, the advent of new applications is forcing another rethink. Based solely on the different market segments enumerated by Paul Otellini, Intel's president and CEO, will this company now have to play and win in all these non-PC market segments?
Bolaji, what is the likelihood Intel would be able to dominate in all these varied market segments? I think the company will eventually play a leading role in the tablet PC market--not all equipment makers want to be like Apple and develop their own processors for the tablet PC. What do you think will happen in all the other segments Otellini talked about?
By moving to the core of the industry and offerings services that keep the system humming, a group within the electronics market has rendered irrelevant the question of ownership and control of the supply chain.
EBN Dialogue enables and encourages you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Not only editors and journalists, but the entire EBN community is able to comment and ask questions. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats.
Thailand Stages a Comeback Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Microsoft Surface: Potential Winners & Losers What are the implications for the electronics industry supply chain of Microsoft Corp.'s decision to launch its own tablet PC? Join industry veteran and EE Times' systems and OEM expert Rick Merritt on Tuesday, July 3, at 12:00 pm EDT for a Live Chat on this subject.
Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Peter Drucker famously said "Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Yet in the razor's-edge world of electronics—with a lean supply chain and just-in-time demands—the need to know the future is vital.
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically.
Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions?
Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.