![]() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Tech Execs Give Innovation Mixed ReviewsWhile nearly three quarters of technology executives feel their organizations are greatly dependent on innovation, only 13 percent believe innovation delivers a competitive advantage, according to a new survey. The study by Accenture, which polled 68 execs in the electronics and high-tech sectors, reported that 74 percent of the executives felt their companies strategies were "very" or "extremely" dependent on innovation. This is an interesting finding, to say the least. High-tech executives will continue to rely on innovation, but the their efforts don't necessarily mean they will beat the competition in the marketplace. Think Apple. In 2010, when Apple introduced its first iPad, the company was all alone in offering an innovative tablet that either met or exceeded the needs of business clients and consumers alike. Three years on, and consumer electronics companies like Samsung Electronics, Lenovo Group, and Amazon.com have introduced tablets with similar features and lower prices, and Apple's competitive advantage in the tablet market has dwindled. The Accenture poll Additionally, the survey revealed that 93 percent of survey participants said their companies' long-term success depends on their ability to innovate, and 70 percent rank innovation as one of their companies' top five priorities. While executives understand that innovation is a core competency that can drive sales, the Accenture study, titled "Why Low Risk Innovation Is Costly," also reveals that technology companies are aware of the challenges innovation brings. A closer analysis of survey responses from participants in the electronics and technology industry found that: Sixty-three percent of respondents indicated opportunities to exploit underdeveloped areas and markets often die. Nearly the same percentage (60 percent) revealed their organizations tend to pursue product line extensions rather than develop completely new products and services. In addition, 59 percent noted their organizations have become more risk averse regarding new ideas. Consistent with these findings, 34 percent said they were "very satisfied" with their initial idea generation; 30 percent said they were very satisfied with their company's conversion of ideas into market-ready products, services, or business models; and just 26 percent indicated they were very satisfied with improving operations by eliminating redundant processes and lowering operating costs. This widespread underperformance in innovation exists despite the fact that 80 percent of respondents indicated they rank innovation among the top five strategic priorities of their corporations. Despite pervasive dissatisfaction, tech industry executives revealed a high degree of commitment and focus on innovation, compared with executives from the 11 other industries. Respondents were asked about five different areas in which they might increase investments in their innovation outcomes. The five were: cloud -- software as a service; mobility -- mobile technology to enable information access anywhere, anytime; big-data and analytics; scientific applications such as nanotechnology, clean technology, and genetics; and social media. Electronics and high-tech executives ranked first across all industries in two categories: cloud (74 percent) and scientific applications (43 percent). These same respondents also showed deep commitments to innovative initiatives versus the other industries. Seventy-two percent have formal systems in place to achieve innovation, placing the sector second among all surveyed industries. Virtually the same percentage (71 percent) reported employment of a chief innovation executive or another officer designated to oversee innovation -- the second highest among all industries. "A major challenge in the high-tech sector is they are committed to investing in innovation but do not seem to be finding ways to generate significant returns on their innovation investments," said Adi Alon, a managing director in the Accenture Innovation and Product Development practice. A formal innovation management system Accenture also found that companies with formal systems in place are 75 percent more likely to define their innovation strategies as delivering competitive advantage (21 percent vs. 12 percent); twice as likely to introduce a new business process or model (32 percent vs. 16 percent); and 35 percent more likely to say they are typically first to market with new products or services (50 percent vs. 38 percent). It's worth noting that respondents in the consumer goods and services, electronics and high-tech, and health provider sectors most frequently said they have formal approaches to innovation. What does a formal approach to innovation entail? According to Accenture, such a system must include end-to-end processes that contribute to speed and flexibility; unique, personalized customer experiences that can engender loyalty and improve revenues; the application of risk management to help drive innovation with analytics, processes, and tools; a reliance on consumers' opinions, which are gathered through the use of big-data and social media; and frugal innovation that can reduce complexity to shorten time to market, reduce the cost of innovation, disrupt business models, and serve the emerging middle class in developing countries. Related posts: |
More Blogs from At the Source
On the hunt for a demand-driven maturity model for companies that are looking at ways to optimize their supply chains.
Removing harmful electronic products in a responsible way is not only the right thing to do, but a smart business move.
While some parts of the high-tech supply chain network can be improved by implementing policies and procedures, other parts of the network are beyond the control of even the most skilled supply chain executive.
As Intel improves its chip technology and deals with a declining PC market, the company is still making a concerted effort to improve its supply chain.
Webinars
Upcoming Webinars
Date: 7/9/2013 11:00 a.m. eastern
Peter Drucker famously said "Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Yet in the razor's-edge world of electronics—with a lean supply chain and just-in-time demands—the need to know the future is vital.
Archived Webinars
Date: 4/30/2013
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically.
Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions?
Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.
EBN Newswire
PHOENIX 1/16/2013
Avnet Embedded Opens Development Labs SAN FRANCISCO 1/8/2013
Vallee Appointed to Reserve Bank Board PHOENIX 12/13/2012
Avnet to Acquire Assets of USI Electronics PHOENIX 12/12/2012
Avnet EMA Adds Digi International SAN FRANCISCO 11/29/2012
UBM Tech Launches Partbuyer.com for Electronic Procurement PHOENIX 11/19/2012
Avnet Expert to Present at CSCO Summit 10/24/2012
Is Your Supply Chain Static or Dynamic? PHOENIX 10/22/2012
Avnet EM Holds SpeedWay Design Workshops PHOENIX 10/16/2012
Avnet EMA Launches Technical Seminars PHOENIX 9/26/2012
Avnet Express Appoints Exec PHOENIX 9/19/2012
Avnet and Triad Team Up in Americas PHOENIX 9/12/2012
Avnet Recognized by InformationWeek Avnet Video Resources
Like Us on Facebook
|
|||||
|
|
||||||