Listen closely if you make and market any types of communication equipment, because a law under revision in the United Kingdom will most likely affect your operation. The UK government is proposing an extension of the Regulation of Investigatory Power Act (RIPA). This will allow greater access to people's phone and email records. The traditional English humor has already sprung into action and given RIPA a new moniker: the Snooper Act. But what's new? Didn't we have Big Brother watching us everywhere already?
Of course we do, under the existing Act -- but not without a warrant. So what's new? Here are some details of the original RIPA Act, from The Guardian:
for more information.)
The government's new regulation seeks expansion of this law. (See Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000: Proposed Amendments Affecting Lawful Interception.) This regulation should be of interest to companies in the electronics industry because it governs the use of many of the communication devices they manufacture. The law will in many ways impact consumers and enterprises, and it's not clear yet how it will affect the propagation of communication devices.
What does this really mean? In the words of a senior Tory MP, it gives "unfettered access to every single communication people send." The Home Office, a government department responsible for taking the lead on policies relating to immigration control, counter-terrorism, policing, drugs and crime, wants to extend the powers of the security services to monitor emails and phone calls, to help prevent terrorism. A spokesman from the Home Office clarified further in a statement:
It is vital that police and security services are able to obtain communications data in certain circumstances to investigate serious crime and terrorism and to protect the public. We need to take action to maintain the continued availability of communications data as technology changes.
The law will monitor the time of communication, duration, and dialing numbers of a phone call or an email address. The home office spokesman further stressed that, "it does not include the content of any phone call or email and it is not the intention of the government to make changes to the existing legal basis for the interception of communications."
OK, I understand a bit better. This law is aimed at terrorists and other law breakers, but is it possible that many innocent people might be caught in its wide jaws? Here is the rationale given by Nick Clegg, a Liberal Democrat and Deputy Prime Minister:
All we are doing is updating the rules which currently apply to mobile telephone calls to allow the police and security services to go after terrorists and serious criminals and updating that to apply to technology like Skype which is increasingly being used by people who want to make those calls and send those emails.
What this tells me is that the current law does allow the government and its officials to essentially do as they please. The government wants complete control of all its citizens' daily activity, not just the terrorist or criminally minded ones.
Critics say the proposed revision to RIPA will constitute a violation of our basic rights to privacy, and I totally agree. Why would the government require further power to demand that Internet service providers install hardware enabling the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), which coordinates all "signal intelligence activities," to monitor all phone calls, text messages, emails, and Websites "in real time without prior warrant"? The law, as Tory MP David Davis noted, "is not focusing on terrorists or on criminals." We are all a target.
These concerns are not without basis. Governments tend to overreach under the guise of protecting the citizenry, and often their actions tend to impede the free flow of commerce. I found that the main concern and reason for opposing the extension of this new law -- that "the system could be wide open to abuse," according to Malcolm Bruce, a senior Liberal Democrat MP -- is one that should resonate with ordinary citizens and business.
In the past, information generated under RIPA has been lost, leaked, stolen, or distributed unnecessarily even by the police themselves. This is the general worry. Just imagine this being done without a court order.
This was why a similar widening of the law was rejected under the Tony Blair government. Current Prime Minister David Cameron's party opposed the measure when it was in opposition. Why are they pressing ahead now with a once abandoned regulatory expansion? And what will its passage mean for your business?