bzbwevdaywqxsece
|

The Myth vs. Reality of Worker Productivity

NO RATINGS
1 saves
View comments: newest first | oldest first | threaded
Page 1 of 2   Next >   Last >>
Himanshugupta
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Local rules and regulations make system productive
Himanshugupta   6/24/2011 1:52:28 PM
NO RATINGS

I agree with your point that it is not individual productivity but system productivity which matters. But i have an opinion that the system productivity can not be defined alone by the organization in which people work but also by where they work. For example, the same organization can have offices in the west and east but the productivity in these two offices can be hugely different even though the organization rules are the same because the people working in two offices are exposed different external factors.

FLYINGSCOT
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Education is key
FLYINGSCOT   6/23/2011 5:51:24 PM
NO RATINGS

I believe people are not educated enough by their employers, their government and themselves with respect to the retirement burden.  If people in the earlier stages of their career were more tuned into what was required to retire comfortably then they would plan and save accordingly.  I understand that many people cannot afford to save for retirement but I do believe that most people could make informed decisions about buying new cars, TVs, holidays instead of saving for retirement.  To retire at 55-60 years old and if one would like $50k per year of retirement income, one would need a retirement pot of $1M......this take a lot of planning and saving to achieve.

Nemos
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
For instance......
Nemos   6/23/2011 5:03:50 PM
NO RATINGS

(You have a point but I can't understand how is connected the unemployed with productivity.)I want also to add this point of view. Even if you can work maximum hours still  productivity maybe be at the lowest level. Because most of the factors that affect the productivity can't be controlled by the worker. For instance, take two workers and give them the same task to do but with different tools or in a different "working environment" the results will be totally different furthermore the productivity will be different.

 

Ken Bradley
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Irony
Ken Bradley   6/23/2011 2:07:11 PM
NO RATINGS

DennisQ, Thanks for your comments.

I do not see my message being “don’t buy American”; but more, let’s make “buying American” more attractive. Inventory Controller asks about oil prices making offshore more attractive, I see the opposite. Over the next couple of years, I see foreign costs getting higher due to inflation, oil (and hence transportation costs) getting higher and the US dollar getting weaker. All of this makes buying locally in America a better value proposition.

But I don’t see the sourcing equation (cost here vs. costs somewhere else) suddenly bringing all jobs back. Each industry segment and opportunity will have a different in-source threshold so it needs to be looked at often as conditions change.  The missing piece, which Americans have always been good at, is innovation.

Innovation is what makes the US productivity number high; it is working smarter, not harder. In fact, working harder, as many America’s are doing today, is often counterproductive as in my example of being understaffed in procurement and foregoing cost reductions. Innovation allows companies to pay higher wages and still meet product cost targets. At a time when we need more supply chain innovation, I don’t see it.

 

hwong
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Americans don't save for their future
hwong   6/23/2011 1:32:52 PM
NO RATINGS

@jay_bond  - The economy of America relies on the way that American spend money. If people dont' spend the money and save up more, then retailers have fewer businesses and hence fewer jobs. That would mean the economy would be worse off. As a result, people will still be without a job.  The growth of America heavily relies on consumers spending and consumer confidence.

DennisQ
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Irony
DennisQ   6/23/2011 1:03:05 PM
NO RATINGS

Ken, let me start off by saying that I agree with your thoughts regarding worker productivity. Your thoughts did not make you unpopular with me!

But I do think it's a little odd that you start the article talking about how not-well-off many Americans are and how many people have given up on even finding jobs, but then later in the article encourage us not to buy American.

Don't get me wrong -- and it's not like I don't agree with you when you say that you should buy local when the value is there -- but I just thought the whole thing was rather ironic because it perfectly illustrated one of the many weaknesses with the current American economy.

Jay_Bond
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Americans don't save for their future
Jay_Bond   6/23/2011 7:13:33 AM
NO RATINGS

@prabhakar_deosthali, you've brought up a very good point. Many Americans, particularly when they are younger want to live for today. They want the best right now instead of later. Credit allows them to do that. They also tend to think that living comfortably and having what they want is better now than later in life.

@KEN, As for productivity, you are correct. This is more about a system than individuals. Before I moved into an office I was in production. Most days 3 of us did more work than the rest of the crew combined, yet as a group we were viewed most productive because of numbers. Hard workers cover up for lazy workers, and that’s not by choice just work ethics. 

 

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Americans don't save for their future
prabhakar_deosthali   6/23/2011 4:04:08 AM
NO RATINGS

The big difference between the Americans and the Asians is not the productivity but the life style.  Americans in general do not save . They live on credit all their life by overspending. As against this Asians are very conservative in their life style and hardly use any credit for their living. Asians start saving early in their life to make their retired life secure. 

mario8a
User Rank
Stock Keeper
The Myth vs. Reality of Worker Productivity
mario8a   6/22/2011 10:28:18 PM
NO RATINGS

 

Hello

one reason why there's so many people w/o retirement plan is because they invest their 401K on stocks and then loose money, I've seen people loosing everything other the stock market.

however, speacially for Supply chain it will be very difficult for USA to be a competitor on the procurement and achieve lower labor cost than ASIA and middle east.

 

Regards

Hawk
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: the truth
Hawk   6/22/2011 9:44:18 PM
NO RATINGS

@hwong, It's a vicious cycle. I recall the statement ascribed to former US president John F. Kennedy who reportedly said: "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country." It was a noble statement worthy of a people moving together in a single direction. My country looks out for me and I look out for it.

Companies continuously tell employees something similar and it reads like this: "Ask not what your company can do for you, ask what you can do for your company." Well, this is wearing thin. My company looks out for itself (shareholders, who get dividends, and top management, who get millions in salaries and bonuses while employees get squeezed.) Workers aren't feeling the love that would make them continue to sacrifice for employers so we have all become mercenary in our actions. I do what is right by myself.

This is the right thing. If my company wants the best of me, it should give me not just the tools to do my work but also the remuneration that would ensure I don't end up as a "Greeter" at Wal-Mart in the twilight of my life. Better still. I understand now: It's not the company's responsibility to prepare me for retirement -- that's my job and I'll find a way to do it, with or without the company. Thinking like this frees me to strategize, plan and execute steps meant to make sure I'll succeed.

Page 1 of 2   Next >   Last >>


More Blogs from Ken Bradley
Focusing on the top of the supply chain hierarchy of needs can streamline supplier partnerships.
In the supply chain hierarchy of needs, certification assurance indicates the supplier’s product will meet regulatory standards, perform as expected, and be available when you need it.
The problem of ensuring adequate security of supply parallels behavior motivation as expressed in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
We seem to have lost the ability to control our destiny. You work hard but fall farther behind. You can’t count on much to be "as expected" in the future.
You'd be outraged to learn you paid 10% more on a car than you should have; some components buyers are paying double what they should.
Twitter Feed
EBN Online Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EBN Dialogue / LIVE CHAT
EBN Dialogue enables you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Open to the entire EBN community of electronics supply chain experts, these conversations see ideas shared, comments made, and questions asked and answered in real time. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats. Stay tuned and join in!
Archived Dialogues
Live Chat 01/15: CPOs Re-Shape Their Business Roles
Increasingly chief procurement officers (CPOs) are re-shaping their organizational role to focus on creating results far beyond cost controls. A new IBM survey explores how.
Live Chat 11/12: Examining the Cyberthreat to Supply Chains
The number of cyberattacks is on the rise and hackers are targeting the supply chain. Drew Smith, founder and CEO of InfoArmor, will be on hand to discuss the reality of today's threat landscape and what to do about it.