I've been known to ask people who engage in social media if they are a Facebook person or a Twitter person. I do this mainly because I have found that people usually gravitate to one or the other; geared internally to the posting model or the conversation model. So far, from my perspective, Google+ seems to be a good balance between the posting/sharing nature of Facebook and the conversational nature of Twitter, mixed with a grand ability to seamlessly include video chat and transparent follower segmenting.
The buzz has been widespread to say the least. And, once Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) opened the doors a little wider, the interested parties streamed in: 10 million of them in two weeks. Yeah, it's mostly the geeks, but it's also the marketers. As champions of our brands, we must always be first into the fray, evaluating the novel and the niche. But what about everyone else? Why, with so much focus on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, would so many have so much more bandwidth to spend on a new player on the scene?
Are You Ready for G+?
Well, for one… It's Google, baby. Who knows the Web and those who use it better than the boys and girls of Mountain View? And with so much knowledge, why wouldn't one think they could put out the perfect social product? And, I mean… it's GOOGLE. It's a household name. People feel more comfortable signing up with Google than with some new no-name. Gone are the days when Gmail was just something the techies used.
And two, we just aren't quite satisfied. It wasn't just curiosity that drove those millions of registrations. What Facebook lacks, Twitter has, and vice-versa. But there has got to be some way to have everything I need in one site, right?
To the majority, this social media thing is still somewhat new. It is easy to get entrenched in believing that these sites will make or break the social revolution. But MySpace taught us that there will be an evolution and probably numerous shakeouts that leave multiple sites in the wake of others. Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) leaked its new site, "Tulalip," on Wednesday. You can still hit the main-page-to-be at Socl.com to see the nice excusatory message they replaced the home page with:
Oops! Didn't Mean to Click Send!
And it's not just Microsoft. I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but I've seen social sites popping up everywhere I look: niche sites like untappd.com (for beer connoisseurs) and eons.com (for baby-boomers). So perhaps we are all going about this wrong in thinking there will be "one site to rule them all." The future may just be one site for every niche.
But Google is a game-changer. It has what other sites don't. Here are just a few things I see that make Google+ a solid draw:
Familiarity.
Maybe just because it is Google, those dissatisfied with Facebook security settings and the site's unwillingness to listen to the desires of its users will find happiness at the site they use so many times a day.
Utility.
It's shown to be an encompassing tool thus far. Chatting, blogging, email, SMS, video chat… It's all there. Google has taken what looks like the best of what exists and built a single platform to house it all.
Simplicity.
Bite my tongue, right? But it is fairly easy, especially the selective transparency with which Google allows you to broadcast to audiences. "Circles" allows you to use Google+ for both business and personal stuff, separated by the click of a button. No more "I don't like to mix my personal Facebook stuff with work" or "I have another Twitter account I use for that." There is no longer a need. Simply choose what you want to share and specify the Circle you want to share it with. I realize you can do this to some extent with Facebook, but it's usually at the contact level instead of the post level.
As marketers in this realm, we need to remain broad and flexible in our focus regarding our strategy for social. Mark my words: Google+ isn't the last major player we'll see step in like this. And it is imperative that we monitor our brands online, even as the landscape grows and new opportunities emerge, allowing people to let their voices be heard in new ways.
Have you used Google+? What are your thoughts? Haven't used it but already have something to say? This is the place to do it. Your comments are welcome.
Well, I think the G+ subscription rate is not real. Anyone with a gmail account can join G+ with a few clicks, not really what "joining means", more like adding it. I'd like to see the involvement rate of users, how many hours they spend per day (per week is so 90s!).
"People feel more comfortable signing up with Google than with some new no-name."
Aandy,
Thanks for the post. I totally agree with you that people feel more comfortable with google. Infact signing up for Google+ is very easy. If we have gmail account then we can easily create one google+ account. We can easily port friends from gmail chat to google+. Overall google+ has impressed many users with its new features.
I understand the element of risk which Most entrepreneurs have to take.But things have changed dramatically(when it comes to risk taking today).
Today thanks to a lot of other uncertainities in doing Business(especially Govt Tax,other regulatory hurdles and Recessionary winds) Risk appetite for most Businesses has gone down considerably.
For most wait and watch (while these guys battle out amongst themselves-FB,Twitter,LinkedIn and Google+) in the meantime they will probably be hedging their bets by using both services for awhile and watching typical response rates on all these services.
@tech4people & @hwong -- I believe that for personal use, we have the luxury of jumping in late. With no audience or outlet for our messaging on a new network, there is no incentive for us to post.
As businesspeople though, we are inclined to the unknown; testing the waters a bit to prepare ourselves for the 'what-ifs'. If Google+ continues its meteoric rise (20 mil users in 24 days...FB took 1152, Twitter: 1035), I would regret not establishing both presence and understanding ahead of the wave.
EBN Dialogue enables and encourages you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Not only editors and journalists, but the entire EBN community is able to comment and ask questions. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats.
Archived Dialogues
Thailand Stages a Comeback Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Euro-Crisis: What It Means for High-Tech Firms Join EBN Editor in Chief Bolaji Ojo and Contributing Editor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday, July 12, at 10:00 a.m. EDT for a Live Chat on high-tech and Europe's economic difficulties.
Microsoft Surface: Potential Winners & Losers What are the implications for the electronics industry supply chain of Microsoft Corp.'s decision to launch its own tablet PC? Join industry veteran and EE Times' systems and OEM expert Rick Merritt on Tuesday, July 3, at 12:00 pm EDT for a Live Chat on this subject.
Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Peter Drucker famously said "Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Yet in the razor's-edge world of electronics—with a lean supply chain and just-in-time demands—the need to know the future is vital.
While no one really can accurately predict the future, we can take guidance from another Drucker saying which is the best way to predict the future is to create it.
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically.
Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions?
Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.
To save this item to your list of favorite EBN content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.