Conflict Minerals: Electronic Firms Aren't Slacking on Compliance

View comments: newest first | oldest first | threaded
User Rank
Stock Keeper
Re: who know wher
kmanchen   11/5/2012 10:07:03 AM

You're right! Electronics companies have enough time to comply, but a lot of trust will need to be put on one's suppliers.

The electronics supply chain has many layers. Mines extract ore, send it to a smelter to produce a rough (60-65 % pure) material, then smelters send it to local refiners who produce a high purity material, that refiners sell to manufacturers. Once smelted there is no practical way to test to determine mine or country of origin.

Each layer of the supply chain has to conduct its' own conflict minerals due diligence. Smelters must confirm mines of origin. Refineries must rely on smelter declarations. Manufacturers must rely on refinery declarations. Customers must rely on supplier/vendor declarations.

Companies need to start asking suppliers for conflict minerals declarations. They need to document all responses. They also need to review the information they receive and address any inconsistencies in supplier responses. 

User Rank
Supply Network Guru
who know wher
FLYINGSCOT   11/5/2012 9:19:09 AM

It is a daunting task to determine where materials are sourced.  A lot of trust will need to placed on one's suppliers to make sure they are complying and being honest with you in their reporting.

User Rank
Stock Keeper
Re: Conflict minerals, REEs and electronics
R.J.Matthews   11/3/2012 9:14:18 AM

Agree that the 90 percent headlines were a bit deceptive. More progress is being made than they suggest Barbara and Ken.

"With only about 21 months remaining until publicly-traded U.S. component manufacturers must disclose their usage of conflict minerals to the federal government, the industry appears to be unprepared, given that about 90 percent of firms so far have not produced the data, declarations, or documentation that will help fulfill regulatory requirements detailing the presence of such minerals in their supply chains."

That does sound bad but there are more areas than just the paperwork which hopefully will be in order when the time comes.

"As of August, the percentage of electronics component manufacturers with available conflict minerals information amounted to only 11.3 percent of the peer group, according to the IHS Parts Management Service at information and analytics provider IHS (NYSE: IHS). These companies account for 17.1 percent of active electronic components on the market, as presented in the figure below."

Suddenly dos not sound so bad with the jump to 17.1 percent of active components. Interesting that was a jump in the graph from November 2011 when the first company rankings came out.


Utilization of conflict minerals is widespread in the electronics market, employed in all kinds of products, from cellphones to hearing aids, to pacemakers and jet engines. For example, IHS estimates that $0.15 worth of tantalum-a conflict material- was contained in every smartphone shipped when Dodd-Frank was originally signed in 2010. In 2012, this would amount to $93 million worth of tantalum in smartphones alone.

Things are not as bleak as they were on the tantalum front with AVX leading the way.




Not all progress though as there are plenty of firms that are making no effort or think they can just post up a bit on their website saying they do not agree with conflict minerals and it is job done. Classic case is Nintendo.



Overall though i think progress is being made just not fast enough when there is a war in the DRC.

The Enough Project says the results are already apparent on the ground in the Congo. The amount of money armed groups make off three of the main conflict minerals (tin, tantalum and tungsten) has dropped 65% over the past two years, according to a report released earlier this month, which attributes the decrease both to the efforts of the tech industry and to new legislation.

Companies once were "turning a blind eye to where they're getting their materials from," said Lezhnev. But after considerable pressure from advocacy groups and college students, more of them have become aware of the issue.
"Sunshine," he said, "is the best disinfectant."



Trouble is this lawsuit could seriously drag things out when activists would be happier moving some of the pressure onto other sectors of the supply chain to get them to follow the Tech sectors example and getting other countries to follow Americas lead and bring in their own laws.

The lawsuit is actually disadvantaging American manufacturers who could be benefiting more from their greater knowledge of the issues and actions already taken.

Journey to compliance
Even after the SEC deadline arrives, the task of reducing or eliminating conflict mineral usage will continue.
"Compliance with the conflict mineral rule is about the journey, rather than the destination," King noted. "Companies will have to arm themselves with information, tools and procedures to continually monitor their supply chains for conflict minerals."

Think we all agree with that anyway.






Barbara Jorgensen
User Rank
Conflict minerals, REEs and electronics
Barbara Jorgensen   11/2/2012 12:39:00 PM

Ken: PricewaterhouseCoopers analyst Jim Forbes presented at ECIA on a related topic and came to the same conclusion. In terms of preparing for REES, electronics is better prepared than most industries but overall, businesses aren't aware of this issue. I think the same can be said of conflict minerals: electronics companies defintiely have a handle on things, but they are going to have to get the word out to business in general to have any kind of impact. Kudos to electronics for being leaders in these efforts, but it's time to spread the word. The origin and nature of these minerals aren't just in the domain of electronics -- it's everybody's concern.

More Blogs from Ken Manchen
This new version will expand coverage to all electrical and electronic equipment, require special marking of finished goods and more compliance documentation, and increase penalties for non-compliance.
Compliance with conflict mineral rules is a burden for electronics makers, but they are worth it if they help curb human rights abuses.
India has issued strict rules on the collection and disposal of electronic waste, and vendors around the world must prepare for the changes.
The US Senate Armed Services Committee uncovered approximately 1,800 cases of suspected counterfeiting over a two-year period. One Air Force supplier alone supplied 84,000 counterfeit devices.
Twitter Feed
EBN Online Twitter Feed
EBN Dialogue / LIVE CHAT
EBN Dialogue enables you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Open to the entire EBN community of electronics supply chain experts, these conversations see ideas shared, comments made, and questions asked and answered in real time. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats. Stay tuned and join in!
Archived Dialogues
Live Chat 01/15: CPOs Re-Shape Their Business Roles
Increasingly chief procurement officers (CPOs) are re-shaping their organizational role to focus on creating results far beyond cost controls. A new IBM survey explores how.
Live Chat 11/12: Examining the Cyberthreat to Supply Chains
The number of cyberattacks is on the rise and hackers are targeting the supply chain. Drew Smith, founder and CEO of InfoArmor, will be on hand to discuss the reality of today's threat landscape and what to do about it.