Nothing is as thorny for healthcare providers as being confronted with a patient who is clearly hurting but does not know the exact source of the pain or how to describe its intensity, making detection, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment extremely difficult. Researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine are working on a solution that may prove beneficial to the health services industry and boost sales at OEMs serving the sector.
The researchers are examining the possibility of developing a diagnostic tool that uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and support vector machines (SVMs) to more accurately determine both the source and level of pains without any input from the patient. Such a tool will improve diagnosis and accelerate treatment by physicians.
Here's how the researchers explained the challenge as well as the potential opportunity for a pain diagnostic tool in a report in PLosOne, a journal of peer-reviewed science:
Individuals with major cognitive or communicative impairments, such as intensive care unit patients or older adults with dementia, may not be able to provide valid self-reports of pain. For those individuals, there are few methods for determining the presence or absence of pain. While behavioral tools exist (such as those assessing facial expressions, vocalizations, and body movements), they too may fail individuals with paralyses or other disorders affecting motor behavior. There is, therefore, a need to develop a pain assessment tool that is based on physiology, and requires no communication on the part of patients.
The "Eureka" moment isn't here yet, but the researchers are getting some promising results and are already fielding questions about the potential for such a device from medical offices, hospitals, and patients. In addition to benefiting the direct users, the pain diagnostic tool would also create sales opportunities for OEMs as well as semiconductor and magnetic material manufacturing companies.
In a series of experiments, the Stanford University researchers demonstrated high pain detection accuracy (up to 80 percent) and concluded that "fMRI with SVM learning can assess pain without requiring any communication from the person being tested." They, however, suggested additional tasks for researchers to undertake before their findings can be used in clinical settings.
A successful replication of their experiments could be beneficial, not only to patients, but also to medical equipment manufacturers. Pain is a common problem that everyone may want to get rid off, but the unfortunate truth is that localizing the source of the problem to ensure effective diagnosis is often difficult. Researchers understand that most times people, when asked by physicians, cannot pin down the source of their pain, hence the focus on developing a tool that can take the guesswork out of the situation.
This is a very interesting study with some true curiositys. I think having these mobile electronics will help out the medical staff extremely well. What I'm curious about is how they actually measure the pain. Individuals pain thresholds are enough to drive a medical staff crazy, but what part of the technology says this is a certain number on their 1-10 scale?
This is really interesting, and what a solution this will really bring in medical world.
But my thinking seems alongside with Jay-Bond- how accurate could this really be in a situation whereby even the patient can not tell how he is feeling.
Sensible research. This device need not 100% accurate if it can atleast detect the pain of 99% patients still it relives so much of pain.
This device can help many paediatrician to identify problems in small infants as they cant describe the pain. I wish this device to be launched soon and interested to know its performance.
That technology could potentially benefit a great many people whose pain is not adequately treated. I wonder if it could also be adapted for use in treating animals.
@saranyati.I really admired the angle from which you viewed the pain detector.
Truly, this is going to be of a great help in the world of infants that are having one pain or the other but telling us is a problem.But what are the conditions that would aid the sensitivity of this device and will it be sensitive enough to detect anything in infants
Sensitivity definitely becomes a question here. Initially the device can start with simple stomach related pains caused because of food poisining and can include any thing to do with respiratory sytem.
Well Ariella, your post is bringing to me a crucial trigger, I really believe it has been discussed a lot: how high are investment in medical technologies vs military technologies? Which is for human people the most proficient in providing benefits across for people everywhere across the globe?
This device can help many paediatrician to identify problems in small infants as they cant describe the pain.
@saranyatil, you are absolutely right. This device will help paediatrician to identify problems in small infants who cannot express their pain. I think this good news for infants parents too who cant understand the pain the infants are in when they are crying.
EBN Dialogue enables and encourages you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Not only editors and journalists, but the entire EBN community is able to comment and ask questions. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats.
Archived Dialogues
Thailand Stages a Comeback Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Euro-Crisis: What It Means for High-Tech Firms Join EBN Editor in Chief Bolaji Ojo and Contributing Editor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday, July 12, at 10:00 a.m. EDT for a Live Chat on high-tech and Europe's economic difficulties.
Microsoft Surface: Potential Winners & Losers What are the implications for the electronics industry supply chain of Microsoft Corp.'s decision to launch its own tablet PC? Join industry veteran and EE Times' systems and OEM expert Rick Merritt on Tuesday, July 3, at 12:00 pm EDT for a Live Chat on this subject.
Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Peter Drucker famously said "Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Yet in the razor's-edge world of electronics—with a lean supply chain and just-in-time demands—the need to know the future is vital.
While no one really can accurately predict the future, we can take guidance from another Drucker saying which is the best way to predict the future is to create it.
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically.
Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions?
Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.
To save this item to your list of favorite EBN content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.