VELOCITY     Accelerating Your Supply Chain Success
The leader in global supply chain solutions

The Mini Supply Chain: Overlooked, yet Potent

NO RATINGS
View comments: newest first | oldest first | threaded
<< First   < Prev   Page 2 of 2
Eldredge
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Efficiency and cost
Eldredge   7/28/2012 7:25:13 PM
NO RATINGS

@Syedzunair - outsourcing may also make sense when the material or component you need has a broader based market that increases your suppliers volume and decreases per unit cost to you.

TaimoorZ
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Lean angle?
TaimoorZ   7/28/2012 11:51:01 AM
NO RATINGS

I think if you are making a mini supply chain within your organizations and treating indiviudal departments/functions as if they exist as independant companies, you need to have measures to track the performance and output of each department. You need to assess each department as if it were an independant company and there must be KPIs to see the performance of the department in isolation regardless of how the overall company has been performing.

TaimoorZ
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Specialization leads to lower costs
TaimoorZ   7/28/2012 11:39:01 AM
NO RATINGS

"I have the greatest competitive potential in the world because my production, material, and transportation costs could not be any lower"

@Doughlas: Shouldn't you be lowering costs if you're outsourcing functions like packaging or shipping to other businesses? Those businesses specialize in these areas and they do it for a large number of organizations so their costs have to be lower than yours. If you are to lower your total costs in the supply chain, you have to outsource certain processes.



WaqasAltaf
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Efficiency and cost
WaqasAltaf   7/28/2012 9:54:05 AM
NO RATINGS

@ Eldredge

When there are problems in raw material supply quantity and prices, vertical backward integration should be a worthy investment and when customers are demanding service quality which retailers are not being able to provide, vertical forward integration should be made. Most of the times, expected bid price outweighs the benefits of integration.

WaqasAltaf
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Process re-engineering
WaqasAltaf   7/28/2012 9:47:23 AM
NO RATINGS

Organizations must focus on process re-engineering if they are to benefit from Douglas's idea of refining the mini-supplychain. Often there are redundant processes or methods that are inefficient to the speedy delivery of the product to the next process in the mini-supply chain. However, nobody has time or gives effort to identifying to these operational weaknesses and people are too involved in routine tasks. 

syedzunair
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Efficiency and cost
syedzunair   7/28/2012 9:26:22 AM
NO RATINGS

Elredge, Agreed. Vertical integration only makes sense when you have the control of inputs and raw materials. On the other hand, outsourcing makes sense when you don't control the materials and you want to produce bulk items of a similar kind. 

Douglas Alexander
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Lean angle?
Douglas Alexander   7/27/2012 8:51:20 PM
NO RATINGS

@Bolaji, I think any improvement at any level in a system will improve the system dynamics. When I used the term "Mini Supply Chain" I was evoking more of a perspective for approaching process and procedure improvements. Every employee has deliverables and every manager that has oversight of the individual contributors will aggregate all the contributions into a department deliverable. I have a diagram on my website that I call an I/O (Input/Output) diagram. It is just a box surrounded with circles depicitng requests and expectations on the left outside border, and circles with results and deliverables on the right outside border. Inside the box, I name the process or procedure that must be executed within the department in order to produce the throughput results. The supply chain likeness is the basic demand and supply model. The inputs are the demands placed upon the department and the supply are the deliverables. By each department's careful review of their internal supply chains...communications, records management, order taking, order fullfillment, timeliness of deliverable, etc. , I believe any internal enhancement will make for faster turn-arounds on "Customer" requests and ultimately happier customers in general. An argument can be made that as soon as you stop improving, you stop growing. Sooner or later, an inefficient system will be weighed down by an overload that arises from increased expectations that come from the growth process. An employer should be just as busy about growing their employees as they are about growing their business. Stop one growth area and the other will either slow down or fail altogether. In that vein, employees that want to stimulate growth and have the know-how to get the job done, should be given every opportunity to succeed by being heard and taken seriously. The biggest potential supply chain enhancement is to have the right people with a full support system behind them enabling them to do their jobs. Make all the links strong and the whole chain will be strong.

Eldredge
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Efficiency and cost
Eldredge   7/27/2012 8:18:35 PM
NO RATINGS

I think it all comes down to efficiency and cost for the organization. Vertical integration makes sense where control of IP, raw material and produiction quality, and scale-up are key; outsourcing makes sense where cost reduction based on volume across a set of customers (by your supplier) helps keep your cost down on mateials and components that don't fall into the first category.

Bolaji Ojo
User Rank
Blogger
Lean angle?
Bolaji Ojo   7/27/2012 1:40:11 PM
NO RATINGS

The focus on mini supply chains within an organization reminds me of the tenets of lean manufacturing. By targeting attention to the little things, you reduce waste and increase efficiencies. The idea you wrote about seems centered on improving the little things so the big thing can be better. Would that be a correct assessment?

<< First   < Prev   Page 2 of 2


More Blogs from Best-Practices
Machine-to-machine technology is growing so rapidly that one report says there could be 10 billion connected devices by 2016. That's a big market opportunity.
Our machines are turning us into themselves. How did we get here?
Games can teach kids a lot about life; so too can we learn about the supply chain from them.
We used to think it might be two to four years before a portable DNA sequencer might become available. Suddenly, it's here and affordable.
RFID makes it possible not only to increase the quantity and types of products streaming through the supply chain, but also to build higher-level products and services.
Latest Poll
Webinars
Archived Webinars
Date: 4/30/2013
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically. Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions? Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.
EBN Newswire
SAN FRANCISCO   1/8/2013
Vallee Appointed to Reserve Bank Board
PHOENIX   12/12/2012
Avnet EMA Adds Digi International
PHOENIX   9/26/2012
Avnet Express Appoints Exec
Avnet Video Resources
The Velocity Report Archive
Click here to see our newsletter archive.
Twitter Feed
EBN Online Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook