If you're a device maker, a supplier to a device maker, or an investor, the world's largest market is probably a place where you want people looking for more use out of their devices, not less."
makes me wonder.Are you planning regime change in China?
If Yes,let me make one thing perfectly clear.The Chinese Communist Party is way more determined and entrenched in its ways than you and me can even imagine.
Its going to need extremely determined change coming in from Inside China to make a difference.Not a bunch of Western Corporations/NGOs or few freedom loving activists.
Unless the status quo breaks down and breaks down decisively(the Contract of Social Upliftment in return for compliance with the rules of the Communist party);I don't really see much point in anyone trying to talk about "Change" or "revolution" in China.
It just won't happen the way we expect it too,especially after the Revolutions all over Central Europe/Former Soviet Union;the Existing powers that be have become more and more careful about letting someone voice there opinions online.
Case in point-Following the High Speed Rail disaster in China,the media/independent writers were decisively muzzled and stopped from saying anything about the tragedy.
This pattern will continue unless the status quo breaks down decisively.
I heard that Sony agreed to offer songs ONLY in china to a particular service. (can't remember the service's name) but maybe things are changing.... who knows!
The entire issue is beyond what Apple can do ... maybe I'm being too blind sidded to say that but seems too much for one company to do.
I can think of a reason why they aren't letting the people in China use it. It might have been a pact made with Apple Corporation ;) They don't want the counterfeit products out in the market. If they restrict use in China, then they are less likely to produce counterfeit products. Actually I am pretty surprised at how well Apple has hold up counterfeit products throughout the supply chain. We don't have to worry that the iphone or ipad that we bought may not be the real one. That's a reassurance
China must have a reason for doing this, its just that what they are trying to protect is what i dont understand and for they not to have bothered about the consequences of this action on their people and the ecomomy, they must then have a strong reason(S) doing that
Jaden, I agree with you because that tactic will not last long neither would it be able to stand the test of time. It is an indirect way of being a power breaker. If USA could move in to China to manufacture products and marketing that products in China is limited or prohibited, the marketiing strength of the USA companies will be seriously impacted, and in turn, China will increase her economic power because supply strength to the rest of the world will be strong. The more the demand they can meet the more financial boyancy the country will be. I believe deprivation of the Chinese from buying their products is not fair to humanity.
The question to be asked is APPLE going to be in trouble? The iphone isn't made in the USA, I have no idea what taxes Apple pay, but I do know there taxes should be based on the percentage of manufacturing and assembly thats done in the US and there should only be tax breaks on what is produced in the US not CHINA or Taiwan. If these rquirements are no met the US people should stop buying the iphone at $500 a pop. ( Bring jobs back to US and other free Counties).
The restriction is a barrier to information. As China is growing economically, with lack of internet freedom the impact will tell on their trade and economic growth soon.
If 450 million people can’t speak freely online in China, at what point does that lower some of those people's incentive to spend $500 on an iPhone? That's a key point to consider in a global economy. One of its components, of course, is also how much is $500 to an average person in China vs. how much it is to an average person elsewhere.
Some how china is still making all effort to be at the top of manufactureres list but then they make use of inferior materials and that is a reason for cheap consumer goods but short lifespan
EBN Dialogue enables and encourages you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Not only editors and journalists, but the entire EBN community is able to comment and ask questions. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats.
Archived Dialogues
Thailand Stages a Comeback Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Euro-Crisis: What It Means for High-Tech Firms Join EBN Editor in Chief Bolaji Ojo and Contributing Editor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday, July 12, at 10:00 a.m. EDT for a Live Chat on high-tech and Europe's economic difficulties.
Microsoft Surface: Potential Winners & Losers What are the implications for the electronics industry supply chain of Microsoft Corp.'s decision to launch its own tablet PC? Join industry veteran and EE Times' systems and OEM expert Rick Merritt on Tuesday, July 3, at 12:00 pm EDT for a Live Chat on this subject.
Join EBN contributor Jennifer Baljko on Thursday August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. EST for a live chat on how electronic manufacturers in Thailand have shored up their supply chain to reduce the impact of future natural disasters.
Peter Drucker famously said "Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Yet in the razor's-edge world of electronics—with a lean supply chain and just-in-time demands—the need to know the future is vital.
While no one really can accurately predict the future, we can take guidance from another Drucker saying which is the best way to predict the future is to create it.
You've heard the saying "the No. 1 supply chain risk is your people." That hasn't always been the case. But today's complex global supply chain requires a new type of multitalented employee. It's one who understands, finance, marketing, economics, is savvy with technology, graceful with relationships and can think analytically.
Where are these people? Are universities properly preparing the next generation supply chain professionals? How do train your existing workforce for these new, demanding positions?
Brian Fuller, editor-in-chief of EBN, will lead a 60-minute Avnet Velocity panel discussion that will ask and answer these and other questions swirling around today's supply-chain talent challenges.
To save this item to your list of favorite EBN content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
