Design Con 2015
Comments
View Comments: newest first | oldest first | threaded
Page 1 of 2   Next >   Last >>
Bolaji Ojo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Is it that big?
Bolaji Ojo   1/31/2013 9:02:01 PM
NO RATINGS

Sparky, The SEC doesn't need authority over private companies to impact them here. The companies that use the conflict minerals are the ones who will be doing most of the monitoring -- of their supply base. These companies need to confirm that their suppliers are not in violation of the law. It wouldn't matter whether your company is private or public; if you sell components to any of the companies overseen by the SEC you will be impacted.

Of course, you are right. The SEC does not have authority over private companies but it's a myth to think the SEC still doesn't get involved in their business. If they are big enough to get involved in any financial transactions managed by companies over which the SEC has authority then they get indirectly supervised.

Sparky the Wonder Cat
User Rank
Stock Keeper
Re: Is it that big?
Sparky the Wonder Cat   1/31/2013 7:51:01 PM
NO RATINGS

Bolaji: All companies that sell to the United States are similarly impacted.

Sparky: Correction - Only PUBLICLY TRADED companies that sell to the United States are similary impacted.

 
  • At this writing I am not aware of the SEC having any authority over privately held companies in the U.S., much less globally. Please advise if you find otherwise.

 

paulmartyn
User Rank
Stock Keeper
Re: Compliance Monitoring
paulmartyn   1/31/2013 5:11:24 PM
NO RATINGS

Yes, but we have exhausted the 'grace period', the rule went into effect on 1 Jan and companies had until 31 Jan to conduct a review of their suppliers.

The first reporting period will be from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, and the first disclosure report must be filed on or before May 31, 2014. 
With 'out of supply network' conflict minerals exempted prior to Jan 31, 2013.

You can download the SEC Ruling here: http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf

 

 

Bolaji Ojo
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
Bolaji Ojo   1/31/2013 4:52:07 PM
NO RATINGS

TaimoorZ, Some of the costs will be borne by companies and some by consumers if manufacturers are able to pass these on to their clients. It's not easy to tabulate the cost of compliance, though.

TaimoorZ
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Compliance Monitoring
TaimoorZ   1/31/2013 4:31:58 PM
NO RATINGS

@Bolaji: I think the companies would never be ready. It's in their interest to delay it as much as possible. I think if the regulations are imposed and a fine is imposed along side, that will serve to motivate the companies more to take quick actions.

TaimoorZ
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re:
TaimoorZ   1/31/2013 4:28:16 PM
NO RATINGS

@Bolaji: Any idea about the economic impact of this? How much will countries lose out on if they go with this. Who would pay for the extra cost?

Hospice_Houngbo
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re:
Hospice_Houngbo   1/31/2013 3:29:54 PM
NO RATINGS

@prabhakar,

"Is the EU and the Asian countries passing similar restrictions?"

It is important that EU and the US lead that effort, hopefully they will impact other nations a well.

Hospice_Houngbo
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re: Is it that big?
Hospice_Houngbo   1/31/2013 3:25:44 PM
NO RATINGS

China is not ready to enforce that regulation, Could there be a pressure from the World Trade Organization (WTO) to make everyone comply?

Bolaji Ojo
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
Bolaji Ojo   1/31/2013 8:14:24 AM
NO RATINGS

The EU is leading efforts to exclude conflict minerals from the supply chain. The rest of the world are following (including the U.S., by the way.) I am not aware of similar legislation in China (doubt it) but two other big players in the electronics supply chain (Japan and South Korea) are probably involved.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Supply Network Guru
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   1/31/2013 6:53:05 AM
NO RATINGS

This enforcement in US means, after January 31st, these conflict materials will find their way to other countries.

Is the EU and the Asian countries passing similar restrictions?

Page 1 of 2   Next >   Last >>




Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EBN Dialogue / LIVE CHAT
EBN Dialogue enables you to participate in live chats with notable leaders and luminaries. Open to the entire EBN community of electronics supply chain experts, these conversations see ideas shared, comments made, and questions asked and answered in real time. Listed below are upcoming and archived chats. Stay tuned and join in!
Archived Dialogues
Live Chat 11/12: Examining the Cyberthreat to Supply Chains
The number of cyberattacks is on the rise and hackers are targeting the supply chain. Drew Smith, founder and CEO of InfoArmor, will be on hand to discuss the reality of today's threat landscape and what to do about it.
Live Chat 11/06: Enterprise Risks, Intellectual Property & Supply Chains
Enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks can be useful to identify, assess, and manage intellectual property (IP) risks that arise in supply chain compliance. We'll look at real-world examples and strategies for mitigating those risks.
Latest Poll
EBN Newswire
SINGAPORE AND SAN FRANCISCO   11/20/2014
Menlo Logistics Keen to Build on 2014 Growth in South Asia
Twitter Feed
EBN Online Twitter Feed