5 Reasons Apple is Set to Create a Car Supply Chain

Why would Apple try to successfully operate an automotive supply chain on a worldwide scale? Perhaps simply because it can.

With almost $180 billion in cash reserves, the company is already on a better footing to enter the car industry than when it reinvented the smart phone market with its iPhone.

Apple has yet to announce that it is even developing an electric car, despite numerous analyst and media reports and strong indicators that it is very much indeed making sizeable investments in an electric car model it plans to produce. Apple could begin production of its car model in 2020, according to Bloomberg.

But before Apple's project does become official, here are five reasons why Apple is more than ready to manage a multibillion dollar automotive supply chain.

  1. $178 billion burning a hole in its pocket  

The automotive business is traditionally a complex, low-margin industry usually requiring that automakers spend billions of dollars in capital expenditures in order to compete on a worldwide scale. Designing, producing, and selling cars also requires a lot of cash, with often low returns and losses depending on hard-to-predict and fickle market tastes and a myriad of other variables.

If and when Apple does launch its electric car, it almost certainly will not compete directly against the top-five automakers, such as General Motors, which is expected to see $9 billion in capital expenditures in 2015 and sold 9.92 million cars last year. Instead, Apple would most likely compete against newcomer Tesla, which is a niche electric car maker that offers an iPad-like infotainment system in its models. Last year, Tesla sold 22,450 cars and invested close to $1 billion in capital expenditures.

Some observers see Apple's move into the low-margin and capital-intensive automotive industry as a sign that it does not know what to do with its cash. But with $178 billion in cash reserves,Apple can easily out produce and spend Tesla by a factor of five or even 10. It also could, if it wanted to (but will almost certainly not),  match General Motors' capital expenditures over a couple of years or more before even putting a dent in the free liquidity it has available.

  1. A ready roster  

Apple already has made hundreds of high-level hires who hail from the car industry. Within its top-level executive ranks, Apple CFO Luca Maestri has two decades of experience working for GM where he held finance- and operations-related executive positions.

Apple has recruited hundreds of other auto industry insiders to join its development team. According to the Wall Street Journal, Apple has recruited hundreds to work on its supposedly secret electric car project, many of whom hail from likely rival Tesla.

Among its hires, A123 Systems, an electric car battery maker, claims in it lawsuit filed against Apple this month that Apple has illegally tapped design experts and other talent from its company. Those whom Apple has hired are also violating their employment contracts, A123 Systems claims in its lawsuit. Regardless, Apple now has acquired in-house talent it needs to develop batteries, a critical component of electric cars.

  1. Design genius

Apple's products have transformed the PC, tablet, and smart phone industries with its minimalistic designs and ease of use that have helped make Apple one of the most recognized brands in the world. Given that cars still can make a fashion statement and how design largely determines whether a particular car model becomes a hit or a dud, the automotive industry would have a lot to gain from Apple's designers' genius. While it has been revealed above that Apple has recruited engineers to get the technology part of electric cars right, its design team certainly has the talent to make an iCar that could define mobility in a very unique and popular way as it has done in the PC, smart phone, and tablet sectors.

  1. Different ways to slice the apple

Apple already sells electronic designs and software interfaces for automotive infotainment, while developing a car around that will only help its high-margin design licensing business, even if does not end up commercially launching its “iCar.”

Already, CarPlay, Apple’s iOS for automotive infotainment, is available in cars. Ferrari, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar, Mercedes-Benz, and Volvo are among those carmakers that offer Apple's CarPlay as an option.  The interface will eventually be available in 25 million cars by 2020, according to IHS Automotive.

Apple also has a successful history of OEM design experience, which it can apply to the development of its own car or for embedded systems for car dashboards. Its infotainment systems would likely serve as in-car extensions for its PC, iPhone, iPad, and iWatch devices.

  1. Global business, global supply chain

Carmakers are in a tough business. They must margins out of a complex network of suppliers, production sites, and other business operations. Often spread out in different locations around the world; large automakers typically must manage regulations and laws, sourcing channels, currency values, and demand that can vary from one region to another.

Much of Apple's production is in Asia and it has been sourcing electronic components and other devices from around the world for decades. So managing supply chain operations around the world is something Apple is very good at.  Apple will obviously be a newcomer to the automotive supply chain, but it already has a stellar resume when it comes to managing the complexities of worldwide production and procurement.

Let us know what you think of Apple's chances of making its mark in the automotive industry in the comments section below.

1 comment on “5 Reasons Apple is Set to Create a Car Supply Chain

  1. luizcosta
    April 17, 2015

    Here is my €10, perhaps €20 contribution. If you agree with this or higher valuation of my opinion. Feel free to add it. Otherwise subtract! :0) One thing people still haven't grasped about Apple Inc (formerly Computer) is that it took Steve Job's pulse to build it. No “developers genious” alone was able to hit this high (or this deep as I put it in my other today's post to “Apple History … ” article of this series) by themselves. How many in previous generations of high valued executives ever had the stamina, the guts, the courage, to meet almost daily with his/her company's developer team to discuss and/or challenge them to continuously dedicate their time and energy solely in absolute customer driven and daring innovation? Two instances come to mind: 1) When one of the prototypes for a new iPod was shown to Jobs, he demonstrated to the team the potential for further pushing the innovative envelope (volume reduction) by tossing the device into a fish tank. 2) Just a few months before the big and awaited launching of the first iPhone in 2007, at one of these meetings with the team, the big guy told them that they had to come up with a way to adopt a new type of material resistant to scratches for the screen. They went to Down Corning and with an old glass invention from the 60's they still met the schedule. The prototype Jobs was given to test had just failed to pass Jobs high quality expectations. To make the long story short, I dare to say that Apple's executives are once again dismissing again a Jobs power like individual as they mistakenly did in 1985. That was when the company was brought from $pocket change to the $2billion level in mere 10 years. Give the time, which no one really know what it would take, having $178billion of cash reserve, can be as bad as a few thousand dollars to spend in the wrong stuff. As a respected sage rabbi once said: Luiz, having too much or too little power are equally undesirable situations. In summary, Jobs would only invest time with his team of genius developers if the iCar could be proven to be a true innovation, which is hardly imaginable in this segmented and low profit industry. I would close with the best recipe for Apple Inc, by completing the subject line of this post: … don't fix it. :0) Luiz (0:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.