Advertisement

Blog

High-Tech Leaders Weigh In on the Fiscal Cliff

During the last decade, high-tech leaders have focused on extending their supply chains to foreign countries at the expense of US economic growth. I thought about this manufacturing strategy when I read a letter the Technology CEO Council sent last week to President Obama and members of Congress.

The letter urged them to pass legislation that would prevent the across-the-board spending cuts and immediate tax increases often called the fiscal cliff. The council also urged lawmakers to implement pro-growth policies that engender fiscal sustainability.

The missive, signed by such luminaries as Dell Inc. chairman Michael Dell, IBM Corp. CEO Ginni Rometty, and Intel Corp. CEO Paul Otellini (who has since announced he will step down in May), offers an interesting assessment of how a stable US economy translates to a better business environment. At the same time, the letter prompts us to ask questions about how far the high-tech industry will go to prop up the US economy, given that so many companies have abandoned local manufacturing in favor of outsourcing or offshoring to Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

The fiscal cliff is no small matter. Economists say the US economy could plunge into another recession if the more than $500 billion of spending cuts and tax hikes Congress approved after the 2011 debt ceiling debate take effect in January. This scenario troubles high-tech leaders, who say letting these policies taking hold could undermine the economy and make it harder to restore growth and create fiscal sustainability.

What high-tech leaders want is stability. The letter prods congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle to come together around the recommendations outlined in the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. The Technology CEO Council highlighted two key points stressed by the commission:

  • Spending cuts should be strategic, rather than across-the-board. Investments in education, infrastructure and research have proven track records of spurring long-term growth. Additionally, modern business practices can help make government operations more efficient.
  • Taxes should be reformed strategically and on a permanent basis, with the overarching goal of promoting the competitiveness of American workers and employers. With respect to business taxes, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles offered the proper formula, recommending lower rates, a broader base and territorial treatment of international income.

These are concerns worthy of our attention, but when examined against the decisions of the last decade, I'm not so sure high-tech leaders are genuinely focused on preventing public policies that will “harm American workers and families,” as the letter says.

In fact, other things occurred during the first 10 years of the 21st century. After the largest terrorist attack on US soil, we asked our military men and women to fight two wars. And the George W. Bush administration implemented tax cuts in the hope that US companies would invest in their businesses, create jobs, broaden the tax base, and jump-start the economy. Instead of creating jobs in the US, the high-tech industry invested in expanding manufacturing and service capabilities elsehwere, primarily in Asia, where lower wages trumped lower US tax rates. This made it harder to create a broader US tax base, and it emboldened China to develop its economy, its high-tech industry, and its skilled labor force.

The high-tech industry cannot be blamed for all the economic problems that occurred under the Bush administration, but it can be said that companies like Apple, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and IBM played their part in gutting US manufacturing, which didn't help the country's economic prospects during these years. In fact, this year's National Science Foundation Science and Engineering Indicators Digest showed that the United States has lost 28 percent (687,000) of its high-technology manufacturing jobs since 2000.

Assessing this recent history helps us to contextualize the high-tech industry's motives and gives us more insight into what it considers its most important task: making a profit at all costs. The letter concludes with an urgent plea to lawmakers to do all they can to find a solution to the nation's economic difficulties.

Few industries face greater global competition than America's tech sector, and few have stepped up to the challenge more aggressively. Our nation's difficult decisions are similar to the very hard questions tech sector leaders face in an unrelentingly competitive marketplace. Our history as a nation, and the history of successful technology companies, shows us the way. We urge you to act now.

The high-tech industry wants to have it both ways. It is asking lawmakers to implement policies that provide fiscal stability, but recent history shows that, when these companies had a chance to create manufacturing jobs in America, they chose to uproot their facilities to pay Chinese workers low wages. In short, the industry needs to take more responsibility for the US economy it says it wishes to create.

In the near future, we need a stronger commitment to the development of US technology manufacturing that will generate jobs along with a decent living wage. Only then can we take high-tech leaders' opinions on the economy seriously.

4 comments on “High-Tech Leaders Weigh In on the Fiscal Cliff

  1. FLYINGSCOT
    November 21, 2012

    Interesting article.  When will we expect a response (if any) to the letter that was presented to the politicians?  Also I read that Obama getting in will prolong a stalemate in government that will result in very little being achieved.  What is the sentiment in the electronics community?

  2. elctrnx_lyf
    November 23, 2012

    This could be one of the difficult question to answer by the obama adminstration. The government runs with the taxes paid by the big companies. If there is any benefit needs to be provided to these organizations the government has to cut the spend on many things while keeping the growth constant.

  3. The Source
    November 26, 2012

     

    FLYINGSCOT,

    First, I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday.  With regard to your question, there's nothing on the Technology CEO Council website that indicates that a response has been made from Congress or the President to this letter. I've noticed that the President did speak with Apple's Tim Cook on the matter.  There was also a widely reported meeting at the White House with leaders from some of the nation's largest companies including Honeywell International's CEO David Cote, Xerox 's CEO, Ursula Burns, IBM's CEO, Ginni Rometty, and General Electric's CEO Jeffrey Immelt.  Apparently, the CEOs did not divulge any details about the meeting to the press.

    Thanks for your comments.

    Nicole

     

  4. The Source
    November 26, 2012

     

     

    Elctrnx_lyf,

    You make a good point.   The government has to create the right balance between generating revenue from taxes, particularly on those who can pay more, while still making the conditions attractive enough for both large and small businesses to invest in the US and create jobs here. I think as we look at the arguments presented in the letter, I'm not sure that the high-tech industry has demonstrated that it is willing to provide answers to America's current economic problems. The George W. Bush administration's tax cuts were designed for companies like those in the high-tech industry to create jobs in the US. That did not happen, and what we saw instead was tech companies creating jobs in China and other parts of Asia as well as Latin America where wages are low.

    Thanks for reading my article, and I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday.

    Nicole 

     

     

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.