I find it heartening that organizations are willing to hold themselves accountable for some of these trends. Knowing where we are (really, in hard numbers) is a good first step. I think that many organizations will see attracting and training women as a real challenge. And as the numbers increase, women will see the opportunity more and more.

I think we have to look at the proportions even earlier. How many girls are taking programming classes in high school? How many go on to major in tech in college? How do their numbers compare to their male counterparts? Tech and engineering have always been male-dominated fields. When I taught at NJIT, some students noted that women were in the minority there. 

Adeniji, 

What do you mean women are not allowed to study science? :/

-Susan

@ Ariella, I think it boils down to past orientation given to women but visible changes are taking place now. Expect to see a change tending to the side of the women in the coming years.

I feel it also has to do with up-bringing, most parents would buy a toy car and gun for their mail children and buy a doll for their female children. Don't you think its start from there?

@Hailey, I certainly agree with you on that, there is a mother in every girl-child In your case, i feel two factors must have led to that 1. You must have been a good and caring mother 2. You daughter discovered her passion early and she eventually pursued it.

@Hailey – Becoming a pediatrician seems like a good combination of both loves. My daughter went the law route – I tried to get her interested in intellectual property, which would have benefited from a science or engineering undergrad. But, she is doing what she loves – and that is very important.

Adeniji, 

That History of Mathematics course was probably very interesting. Of course I know about Algebra and Trigonometry. 🙂 I am a woman of this present Era. 😀 

So you were talking about Ancient Egypt. Now I see what you meant. I thought you were saying that women are not allowed to study sciences now, somewhere, or some time in the near past.

I didn't think of that far in history because well, it's too far. Things are supposed to have improved in more  than two thousand years. Even though sometimes it seems so much is just the same. 🙁 

-Susan

Adeniji, 

Yes. In good part it starts from upbringing. Everything starts with parenting. That's why there should be a parenting school. parenting is the only life-long occupation with responsibility that doesn't require any training, and it's wrong.

Than it countinues in scociety in general making gender differences. Those boys and girls who were programmed by their parents in the wrong way with targeted toys, and other things are going to take that way of thinking to the enterprise.

That's why still today there is so much difference between male and female employees in regards of salary, treatment, and other things. 

Also, how many women still believe the only function they can have in society is to find a husband, get married, have children, and that's it. 

There is scientific research about the benefits for a company of having a good balance between male and female employees. 

-Susan

Hailey, 

“Seems like more women have stopped waiting for corporate opporutunity and are making opportunities for themselves.”

Indeed. As we were discussing below, I believe upbringing and early encounters with technology and how things work play a sifnificant role in the future development. Of course, this can't be aplied as an absolute formula, just as anything in this world is absolute. 

However, if we look at some facts and figures of today we see a good number of women have started their own projects, their own startups, and have gathered in groups of women devolted to working in science and technology. 

So, now we see more student engineers, developers, etc., many of which have played video games, computer games at an early stage in their lives. Toys are technology today. Little girls get to play with phones, tablets, and computers as much as little boys.

One of the best parts of kids and technology is that absolutely no one can say “this is for boys” or “this is not for girls.” So, parents are trapped in that old thing. 😀  

Then, we have to see that old, traditional toys have become way too boring for the curious kids. This has gaving me an idea: Next time I am close to a shopping mall, I might go to the toys department and see what's in offer there. I might even ask a shop assistant about sales. 😀 

The only problem is that my little sample will not be representative of the world's situation. The Scandinavian and Nordic countries in general count with a high percentage of women in positions that are considered male dominated in other places. Colors for kids are always neutral. There is no pink and blue thing. Well. I will stop, or I will end up writing a book here. 

-Susan  

@Susan, she fell in love with human biology in the middle of high school because she had a great teacher and a great opportunity to take college classes and do cadaver work. Now she's taking chemistry…she doesn't like that nearly so well! 🙂 I think it points to the importance of getting young people, male or female, engaged in STEM early and often.

The number of women in technology related industries is rising and is higher now than at any time since 1945. 

What I have seen over the past 30 years is that there are few women being trained, that there is discouragement at schools, universities and in corporations.  Some of this is agressive sexism but some is fear – men don't know how to work with women or to teach them, so tend to ignore them.

The rise in women in the small company and self employed market reflects a decline in corporate employment – the only way to get a job is to set up your own company, state help for those setting up a busines is better than for the unemployed and women are marginalized within the corporate structure.

In a number of large corporations, I have seen men working in one department and women in another, so whilst there might be a large number of women in the building, they are in junior and support roles, not actively involved in technical functions.  I have rarely seenactive distrepect or hostility to women in technical roles, once they are there, they are treated as a worker and expected to perform as well as everyone else but the administration structure still seems to regard a woman as something to be treated differently.

regards

@hagalrif, thanks for weighing in. I have seen much of what you mention. I have said this before but I was hired 25 years ago as a minority intern since women were a minority in technology. For me, it stuck.  However, I felt the weight of having to prove that I belonged where i was, rather than being handed the job on a platter. Have you seen programs or ways of dealing with the problem that really address the problem? What do we need to do to fix it?

hagalrif, 

Hmm. It doesn't sound too good. :/ It would be terrible if in 70 yeras nothing would have changed. Still, the change has been slow and not enough since then. 

May I ask in what part of the world is that you have been observed all that? Annother thing that happens is that the inclusion of women in technology greatly differers from one place to another.

I believe there is much more attention to pay in certain parts of the world where there are brilliant women who could be contributing to the technological advancement of  their company/country. Yet, they are almost invisible. 

-Susan

A new study finds that having women in management directly translates to better business. I saw a Washington Post article about the new and large study from Credit Suisse:

@Susan: It shows that the gender is not a problem or a deciding factor these days. There is equal opportunity all around.