A week ago, when the news hit the wire that Renée James, Intel's president, is stepping down, the first question that popped into everyone’s head, including mine, was — Why?
A flood of questions came to mind. Even though I really didn’t know her, I was suddenly worried about her.
Was she forced out in an executive reshuffle at Intel? What went wrong? How long was she the No. 2 executive at the world’s largest chip company? Isn’t two years an awfully short time for any top executive to really leave a mark on her company?
Then I read memo she sent to Intel’s employees. She started out saying:
As all of you have heard from Brian, I have made the very difficult decision to step down as President of Intel in order to pursue an external CEO role. When Brian and I were appointed to our current roles, I knew then that being the leader of a company was something that I desired as part of my own leadership journey. Now is the right time for me to take that next step.
“Wow,” I said to myself.
Seriously, she’s saying that it’s her own naked ambition [to become a CEO elsewhere] that made her decide to leave.
I love her straightforwardness. I also love the way she unapologetically disclosed her hopes, ambition and self-confidence.
She fell back on none of the usual excuses, like “I want to spend more time with my family.” Had she done that, most of us would have just assumed, whether true or not, she’d been squeezed out by the boys’ club.
More important, though, she sidestepped the trap faced by any female executive who says, in parting, that she wants to spend more time with her kids and husband.
Any such female executive is immediately judged negatively, labeled as a failure. A quitter. “Oh, she just wants to be a mom again.” Worse, “That’s why we can’t depend on a woman to lead a company.”
In contrast, when a male executive says that he’s leaving “to spend more time with my family,” we say he’s sensitive, reasonable, “authentic.”
Talk about double standards.
To read the rest of this article, visit EBN sister site EE Times.